...

Interview with ex-British Special Forces Security Director Charged with leading Investigation in to Corruption in Southern African Nation by Paul Irons and how this affects all of US today

The following interview took place in 2013 and is assessed as being of merit, for those wishing to not only avail themselves of the levels of corruption in governments across the World, but also, for those wishing to fulfil contract obligations in volatile countries to aid in Prevention of Criminal, Subversive Acts taking place against YOU during your stay overseas.

NOTE: Corruption exists in all countries to a greater, or lesser extent. The Poorer the country, the more OVERT it is, however, the Developed World, and I include the UK, US, Australia/NZ, Canada and EU nations are just more subtle as to how they apply gerrymandering practice. In Africa, it’s called a Rigged Election or Bribery, in Europe/North America it’s often called some Gerrymandering or Lobbying with Facilitation Payments.

You will see from the following interview, how individuals with strange sexual proclivities appear to bypass vetting, something that would appear to be applicable to the British Government and highlighted in the UK recently by the Media over the pressure applied to Civil Servants within the British Government to assist in ‘fast tracking’ the appointment of Jeffrey Epstein associate (a convicted Paedophile suspected of attempting to Blackmail Former US President Bill Clinton, amongst others) Lord Peter Mandelson as the UK Ambassador to The United States of America.

A lack of correct vetting for individuals in key positions ultimately can cause the collapse of government and weakens a country to a point, where it becomes vulnerable to Foreign Attack. The idea of vetting is to highlight weakness in appointed individuals in order that they cannot be blackmailed into acting on behalf of subversive, enemy agents. This can include Private Corporations linked with ‘Philanthropic’ individuals that wish to profit by forcing private individuals to adhere to legal statutes passed by (supposedly) vetted individuals charged with leading Ministries in Government.

Epstein, Gates and the PANDEMIC “Business Model” they built together

One of the most damning indictments revealed in the Epstein files is his partnership with Bill Gates. Forget the carefully crafted spin about ‘regretting’ having dinner with Epstein. These weren’t casual dinners, they were planning sessions. Back in 2015, Gates and Epstein exchanged emails about ‘preparing for Pandemics’ and strategies ‘to involve the WHO’; Gates wrote ‘I hope we can pull this off’. This eerily foreshadowed the 2019 Event 201 simulation that just happened to model a Coronavirus outbreak. These people may just put ‘Mystic Meg’ out of business such are their powers of Divination.

However, let’s rewind even further, to the real blueprint, the financial architecture that made the Pandemic response not just possible, BUT PROFITABLE. The story crystallises in a chilling 2011 email exchange. Juliet Pulis, a JPMorgan executive under then Chairman Jes Staley emailed Jeffrey Epstein with a list of detailed questions. The source? The JPMorgan team putting some ideas together for Gates.

The Questions were precise; What are the Objectives? Is anonymity key? Who directs the investments and Grants? This wasn’t JPMorgan consulting a philanthropic expert. This was a Trillion Dollar Bank asking a Convicted Felon to architect a Billion Dollar philanthropic fund for one of the Richest Men on Earth.

In July/August 2011, emails between Mary Erdoes CEO of JPMorgan $2 Trillion Asset & Wealth Management Division and Epstein outlined how many from JPMorgan was to be supplied to Gates ‘FOR VACCINES’ not for PANDEMIC Research or Better Public Health Infrastructure.’ 1.

ANYHOW, now to the Interview of how Corruption functions in the Third World.

Interview with Security Director, ‘Peter’

Author: Briefly outline the background to the case that you were involved in in Southern Africa, I understand that you were called in to investigate the abduction of Prison Officers from the target country?

Director: The task that I headed up in 2012 was linked to another security firm that didn’t have expertise in this (Kidnap for Ransom) field. I was good friends with the owner (of this company) and he asked for our assistance. Their client’s representative, who was the victim, was kidnapped in the capital and then promptly released when we were in mid-air. Regardless of the spurious details, the client wanted us to ascertain what had occurred and assist that country’s local police and intelligence agencies in this to try and prevent a recurrence. I didn’t take part in any of the negotiations as the victim had been released unharmed prior to my arrival and am not aware of a ransom having been paid. I must add that that does not mean that one was not paid.

Author: Prior to your arrival what had actually been done by the local security forces and how were you received by them?

Director: Very little, in fairness, they didn’t really know where to start and the endemic corruption meant that we were not making progress. The police, as is often the case in Developing Countries were arrogant and obstructive at every juncture although the Intelligence Service head (their equivalent of M to use Bond Terminology) was much more helpful and wanted to make a difference. Through him, I had a direct line to the President who stated that we could call him at any time. I was slightly surprised to see that the head of the Intelligence Service had no equipment, no outside resources and no previous experience of these scenarios.

Author: What were the first steps that you took, what was the priority?

Director: To interview the victim and the family as I felt, given the scenario, that they would have given the most accurate and honest account of what the victim’s actions had been prior to being abducted (movements, interaction and schedule). Moreover, it would give me clues as to the source of the kidnapping. Additionally, there were a number of, what initially appeared to be, identical abductions in the city and I was granted permission to interview these (released) victims as well.

Author: What aroused your suspicions as to insider involvement?

Director: There were a number of points, however, as an example, it was immediately of interest to me that during the ransom drop-off, somebody kept disabling the bag-drop man’s “where’s my IPhone application.” There were also several ‘dry cleaning’ stops on his route and he was even instructed over the mobile to get out of his car in the middle of nowhere and walk away with his hands up once he had dropped off the bag. These were just some of the reasons that I erred towards the whole incident being coordinated by a serving or ex-policeman (or figure within authority). Subsequent ‘snippets’ of intelligence reinforced this theory.

Author: Did you identify a pattern or modus operandi here?

Director: Initially no, the subsequent abductions were amateur copycat incidents and I dismissed their relevance. That was, until I interviewed the latest abductee who confirmed my initial suspicions. These essentially were that senior members of the police were complicit in the initial abduction and that a professional group had been involved.

Author: What were your recommendations to (the reliable) local agencies to resolve this?

Director: I wrote formal conclusions, directed the Intelligence Service to whom I thought was responsible/involved, gave them an action plan involving trickle arrests with concurrent surveillance of those still at large in order to gauge response. This plan was not really being correctly implemented and it was clear to me that senior police officers were blackmailing (or more specifically had control of) the head of the Intelligence Service due to his illegal private activities which related to some primitive sexual preferences. The effect of this was that some token arrests were made of the people that we identified as minor level ‘players’ but the ringleaders’ were left untouched. I subsequently departed the country with the consent of the client as there was nothing more that I could do although my conclusion inclined me to feel that those in authority and criminal networks were one and the same. (Interview Author/‘Peter’, 2013)

To reiterate, the above is not exclusive to Developing Countries; the highly knowledgeable author Whitney Webb in her two volume masterpiece ONE NATION UNDER BLACKMAIL explains in exact detail, with extensive referencing, how links forged in World War Two by American Intelligence (Office of Strategic Services, latterly known as the Central Intelligence Agency CIA) with The Unions, and by default The Mafia, ostensibly to monitor the Ports, were never broken post the ending of hostilities with the Axis Powers due to mutual convenience.

REFERENCE 1. Epstein, Gates and the Pandemic Business Model, they Built Together. The Truth About Cancer journal 2020

No Responses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.